Core Attributes of Professionalism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ATTRIBUTES OF THE HEALER Caring and compassion : a sympathetic consciousness of another's distress together with a desire to alleviate it. Insight : self-awareness; the ability to recognize and understand one's actions, motivations, and emotions. Openness : willingness to hear, accept, and deal with the views of others without reserve or pretense. Respect for the healing function : the ability to recognize, elicit, and foster the power to heal inherent in each patient. Respect for patient dignity and autonomy : the commitment to respect and ensure subjective well-being and sense of worth in others and recognize the patient's personal freedom of choice and right to participate fully in his/her care. Presence : to be fully present for a patient without distraction and to fully support and accompany the patient throughout care. ATTRIBUTES OF BOTH THE HEALER AND THE PROFESSIONAL Competence : to master and keep current the knowledge and skills relevant to medical practice. Commitment : being obligated or emotionally impelled to act in the best interest of the patient; a pledge given by way of the Hippocratic Oath or its modern equivalent. Confidentiality : to not divulge patient information without just cause. Autonomy : the physician's freedom to make independent decisions in the best interest of the patients and for the good of society. Altruism : the unselfish regard for, or devotion to, the welfare of others; placing the needs of the patient before one's self-interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".