MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1878333214 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0681

Rayleigh waves in generalized thermoelastic medium with mass diffusion

2015· article· en· W1878333214 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rajneesh Kumar, Vandana Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsThermoelastic dampingRayleigh waveIsotropyClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisBoundary value problemWave propagationMechanicsThermodynamicsOpticsThermalQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with the study of propagation of Rayleigh waves in a homogeneous isotropic generalized thermoelastic solid half space with mass diffusion in the context of the Lord–Shulman (Lord and Shulman. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 15, 299 (1967)) and Green–Lindsay (Green and Lindsay. J. Elasticity. 2, 1 (1972)) theories of thermoelasticity. The medium is subjected to stress-free, isothermal, isoconcentrated boundary. After developing a mathematical model, the dispersion curve in the form of a polynomial equation is obtained. The roots of this polynomial equation are verified for not satisfying the original dispersion equation and therefore are filtered out and the remaining roots are checked with the property of decay with depth. Phase velocity and attenuation coefficient of the Rayleigh wave are computed numerically. The numerically simulated results are depicted graphically. The behavior of the particle motion is studied for the propagation of Rayleigh waves under Lord–Shulman model. Some special cases are also deduced from the present investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207