MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1878399745 · doi:10.1002/2013ms000255

A practical scheme of the sigma‐point Kalman filter for high‐dimensional systems

2013· article· en· W1878399745 on OpenAlex
Youmin Tang, Ziwang Deng, K. K. Manoj, Dake Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsData assimilationKalman filterComputer scienceEnsemble Kalman filterAlgorithmState-space representationMeteorologyExtended Kalman filterArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While applying a sigma‐point Kalman filter (SPKF) to a high‐dimensional system such as the oceanic general circulation model (OGCM), a major challenge is to reduce its heavy burden of storage memory and costly computation. In this study, we propose a new scheme for SPKF to address these issues. First, a reduced rank SPKF was introduced on the high‐dimensional model state space using the truncated single value decomposition (TSVD) method (T‐SPKF). Second, the relationship of SVDs between the model state space and a low‐dimensional ensemble space is used to construct sigma points on the ensemble space (ET‐SPKF). As such, this new scheme greatly reduces the demand of memory storage and computational cost and makes the SPKF method applicable to high‐dimensional systems. Two numerical models are used to test and validate the ET‐SPKF algorithm. The first model is the 40‐variable Lorenz model, which has been a test bed of new assimilation algorithms. The second model is a realistic OGCM for the assimilation of actual observations, including Argo and in situ observations over the Pacific Ocean. The experiments show that ET‐SPKF is computationally feasible for high‐dimensional systems and capable of precise analyses. In particular, for realistic oceanic assimilations, the ET‐SPKF algorithm can significantly improve oceanic analysis and improve ENSO prediction. A comparison between the ET‐SPKF algorithm and EnKF (ensemble Kalman filter) is also tribally conducted using the OGCM and actual observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it