Les acteurs du mouvement de soutien face à l’immigration illégale en France et en Grande-Bretagne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se concentre sur les questions de l’asile en Grande-Bretagne et des « sans-papiers » en France pris comme des objets d’étude comparables dans le cadre de la controverse plus large sur l’immigration « illégale ». Notre analyse porte sur un large nombre d’acteurs qui interviennent en soutien des demandeurs d’asile et des « sans-papiers », dans le cadre de champs multi-organisationnels qui s’étendent sur plusieurs niveaux. Plus particulièrement, nous abordons les dynamiques complexes situées à l’intersection de l’espace public et des politiques publiques, au sein et au-delà des frontières de l’État-nation. Nous examinons ainsi une gamme de facteurs qui constituent le noyau des discussions courantes de l’approche des processus politiques, nous inscrivant ainsi dans le débat relatif aux filiations et aux limites de l’approche de Charles Tilly, telle que présentée dansFrom Mobilization to Revolution(1978).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".