MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1878494684

Harmonization of Data: Lessons from Major International Organizations

2012· article· en· W1878494684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chandra Aleong, John Aleong

Bibliographic record

VenueCaribbean dialogue · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSpatial and Panel Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStandardizationHarmonizationTerminologyMetadataLegislationAdaptation (eye)ConfidentialityComputer scienceIndex (typography)Product (mathematics)Process managementBusinessPolitical scienceComputer securityWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the importance of research into the design, maintenance and implementation of a metadata system that would integrate national and regional data and the development of statistical measures like the Consumer Price Index (CPI), that are meaningful and relevant to current CARICOM economies. the end product is a statistical metadata repository that is robust enough to accommodate changes over time.The paper is structured in the following way. First, there is be an overview of the strategic plans of two organizations that have had to design, maintain and enhance very sophisticated data systems. Developments in managing large censuses; issues of privacy and confidentiality; standardization of statistical terminology and methodology; and the need for common legislation that would enable all of this to be accomplished are some of the issues discussed. Finally there is an examination of the existing databases of CARICOM countries and a discussion of the computation, the problems, and the need for further research on the consumer price index and its adaptation to CARICOM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.161
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.174
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1610.174
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.015
Science and technology studies0.0070.019
Scholarly communication0.0210.018
Open science0.0070.014
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCaribbean dialogueSame topicSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207