MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1879078034

Non-native plant invasion of boreal forest gaps : implications for stand regeneration in a protected area shaped by hyperabundant herbivores

2009· dissertation· en· W1879078034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandParks CanadaSociety for Conservation Biology
KeywordsThistleAbies balsameaBalsamBiologySeedlingRegeneration (biology)Invasive speciesEcologyDisturbance (geology)AgroforestryGeographyAgronomyBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) is notorious as an aggressive, invasive non-native weed in agricultural fields, grasslands, and roadsides throughout North America, it has not typically posed a threat to boreal forests. However, in the balsam fir (Abies balsamea) -dominated lowland boreal forests in Gros Morne National Park (GMNP- Newfoundland, Canada), Canada thistle has recently invaded natural areas on a large landscape scale, occurring in 42% to 55% of anthropogenic and natural forest gaps, respectively, and frequently forming dense monocultures. It is important to determine if and how Canada thistle invasion will affect regeneration of native trees, particularly since regeneration of gaps in GMNP is already threatened by non-native, hyperabundant moose (Alces alces) populations, which exert extreme browsing pressure on forests. This study assessed the condition of forest gaps to support conifer regeneration by describing the current level of balsam fir regeneration, quality of seedbeds, and degree of Canada thistle invasion. Balsam fir seed and seedling addition experiments were performed in gaps to determine the effect of thistle presence on emergence, growth, and survival of balsam fir. Finally, the potential for allelopathic impacts on native conifers from Canada thistle was assessed in greenhouse experiments. Results revealed that gaps are not regenerating, contain poor seedbeds for conifer recruitment, and are heavily disturbed by moose browsing. Canada thistle invasion further threatens balsam fir emergence and early seedling survival. However, older, transplanted fir seedlings were not negatively affected by thistle, suggesting that seedling planting may be an effective management strategy to encourage fir regeneration in thistle-invaded gaps, and potentially even phase out shade-intolerant thistle plants over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it