MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1879305221 · doi:10.1590/2175-623621799

Diálogos Interdisciplinares em Saúde e Educação: a arte do cuidar

2012· article· pt· W1879305221 on OpenAlexaff
Ivani Catarina Arantes Fazenda, Fernando César de Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueEducação & Realidade · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO O artigo descreve o cuidado em suas dimensões histórica, filosófica e educacional, sendo a última focada em dois movimentos práticos: cuidar de si e cuidar do outro, sob o prisma metodológico interdisciplinar que reconhece a urgência da integração entre o fazer e o ser, mesclando as histórias de vidas. Ao considerar a escola como um local de ação terapêutica, no qual há movimentos cuidadosos atrelados ao currículo, à formação docente e ao relacionamento interpessoal, redesenharemos uma didática para a educação que transcende os bancos escolares, onde a questão vital capaz de curar as pessoas é reconhecida nas inquietações dos alunos e professores rumo à valorização da cura nata em cada um de nós, porém não compreendida por muitos de nós.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducação & RealidadeSame topicHealth, Nursing, Elderly CareFrench-language works237,207