MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1879367958 · doi:10.14195/2182-844x_2_11

CORPO E TEMPO - AS IMAGENS IDEALIZADAS DA ARTE EGÍPCIA

2015· article· pt· W1879367958 on OpenAlexaff
José das Candeias Sales

Bibliographic record

VenuedigitAR - Revista Digital de Arqueologia Arquitectura e Artes · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Egypt and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O espectro da degenerescência corporal, destino de todos os humanos que alcançam idades maisavançadas, era algo pesado e terrível para os antigos egípcios. Compreensivelmente, ansiavam pelaanulação desses efeitos e dessas marcas.A sua preferência quase obsessiva nas pinturas, esculturas e baixos-relevos vai para as figuras da juventudeou da maturidade de homens e mulheres. Exploradas magicamente, essas figuras, estão, porém, ao serviçode um outro ciclo da existência: a existência extraterrena. Foram elaboradas e ganham consistência pelasua profunda ligação com esta dimensão do universo do Além.Segundo a concepção egípcia, os seres vivos no Além deixam de estar sujeitos ao tempo e às suasmanifestações. Para eles, o tempo não existe. O tempo no Além não está sujeito à mudança inerente àlinearidade, não é mutável, nem é dinâmico: é imóvel, estático e fechado.Subjacente às “moradas da eternidade” onde essas representações eram incorporadas (mastabas,hipogeus, templos funerários) há, portanto, uma concepção de temporalidade imóvel ou estacionária quelhes dá suporte ou justificação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuedigitAR - Revista Digital de Arqueologia Arquitectura e ArtesSame topicAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207