MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1880011102

The role of risk in the configuration of Anglo-Saxon societies

2015· article· en· W1880011102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maximiliano E. Korstanje

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios sociales (Hermosillo, Son.) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAcademic Research and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalismHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen / AbstractEl trabajo tiene como objetivo principal ahondar en las causas centrales del apego que muestran las sociedades anglosajonas al riesgo. La primera, es que el capitalismo tie -ne una gran influencia de la mitologia ger-manica antigua. Segundo, que la propen-sion del hombre moderno por mitigar riesgos futuros se explica por la interpreta-cion de los mismos riesgos que desea miti-gar. Mientras las culturas mediterraneas han hecho de la caridad y la tradicion dos aspectos fundamentales de sus formas de ver el mundo, los anglosajones se encerraron al sentido de la predestinacion. Infiriendo medidas protectoras para eventos que toda-via no han sucedido, los anglosajones se ven mas propensos al avance tecnico y a la gene -racion de nuevos riesgos. Ello explica por-que los Estados Unidos, Canada, Nueva Zelanda e Inglaterra encabezan la investiga -cion en materia de manejo de riesgo y desas -tres en todo el mundo. Palabras clave: riesgo, mundo anglosajon, mundo mediterraneo, Peligro, futuro, pre-destinacionThis paper is aimed to explore the main causes of the attachment of English speak-ing countries to risk. The first, capitalism de -rives from the Old Norse Mythology. Sec-ondly, human beings in modernity to mitigate future risk may be explained by the interpretation of the same risk to mitigate. Whilst Mediterranean cultures have adopt-ed the charity and tradition as two impor-tant institutions to see their world, Anglo-world was based on the foreclosure to the future. This engenders a new problem, since the future has not taken room yet, any act to prevent the future may even precipitate the undesired event. This explains why Anglo-Saxons are prone to avoid or face risk than other cultures as well as their attachment to technological advance. Countries as US, New Zealand, Canada, and England pivot the applied investigation in disaster and risk fields worldwide.Key words: risk, Anglo-world, Mediterra-nean-world, danger, future, predestination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudios sociales (Hermosillo, Son.)Same topicAcademic Research and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207