MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ADAPTATION RATES OF LYTIC VIRUSES DEPEND CRITICALLY ON WHETHER HOST CELLS SURVIVE THE BOTTLENECK

2009· article· en· W1881299912 on OpenAlexafffund
Zaheerabbas Patwa, Lindi M. Wahl

Bibliographic record

VenueEvolution · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyLytic cycleAdaptation (eye)Host (biology)PopulationBottleneckVirusPopulation bottleneckExperimental evolutionEvolutionary biologyGeneticsVirologyGeneDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a branching process approach to estimate the substitution rate, the rate at which beneficial mutations occur and fix, in populations of lytic viruses whose growth is controlled by periodic population bottlenecks. Our model predicts that substitution rates, and by extension adaptation rates, are profoundly affected by the survival of infected host cells at the bottleneck. In particular, we find that direct transfer (or environmental) bottlenecks, in which some fraction of both free virus and host cells are preserved, are associated with relatively slow adaptation rates for the virus. In contrast, viruses can adapt much more quickly when only free virus is transferred to a new host population, as is typical in an epidemiological setting. Finally, when premature lysis of the host-cell population is induced at the bottleneck, we predict that adaptation rates for the virus will, in general, be faster still. These results hold irrespective of the life-history trait affected by the beneficial mutation. The substitution rates in the presence of environmental bottlenecks are predicted to be as much as an order of magnitude lower than in the other two cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvolutionSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207