A Comparative Study of Downsizing Strategies applied in the Reforms of China’s State-owned Enterprises
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes two typical downsizing strategies applied in changes of China’s state-owned enterprises based on behavioral science, which are proactive strategy and reactive strategy. It points out the different impacts upon employees from proactive and reactive strategies, using survey and field study methods. Finally, the conclusion is that proactive downsizing strategy is the best one in changes of China’s enterprises nowadays. Key words: downsizing, downsizing strategy, reforms of China’s state-owned enterprises Resume: Cet essai analyse d’abord deux types de strategie de reduction appliques dans le changement des entrepries d’Etat chinoises et qui sont bases sur la science behavioriste, a savoir la strategie preactive et la strategie reactive. Ensuite il indique, par des methodes d’enquete et d’etude sur le terrain, les influences de ces deux strategies sur les employes. Enfin, on aboutit a la conclusion : la strategie de reduction preactive est la meilleure dans le changement actuel des entreprises d’Etat. Mots-Cles: reduction, strategie de reduction, changement des entreprises d’Etat
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it