MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1881506156 · doi:10.1109/test.1996.557094

LIMSoft: automated tool for design and test integration of analog circuits

2002· article· en· W1881506156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensitivity (control systems)Computer scienceAnalogue electronicsAutomatic test pattern generationFault (geology)Design for testingElectronic circuitBuilt-in self-testElectronic engineeringFault detection and isolationComputationReliability engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringAlgorithmElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating design and test presents a good challenge in today's analog circuit manufacturing process. Designs should be made according to the sensitivity of the output to all the components. Furthermore, sensitivity can be used to observe component deviation (soft faults) and hard faults from the output. This paper presents an automated sensitivity analysis tool, called LIMSoft, which offers the possibility of sensitivity computation and analysis in order to design fault-resistant circuits and generate test vectors for both soft and hard faults. Some applications for integrating test and design are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207