MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1881553573 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22279

Water removal from biodiesel/diesel blends and jet fuel using natural resin as dehydration agent

2015· article· en· W1881553573 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Constantinos Tsanaktsidis, Evangelos P. Favvas, George Tzilantonis, S. G. Christidis, Elissavet C. Katsidi, A. Scaltsoyiannes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiesel fuelBiodieselFlash pointWater contentMoistureCombustionMaterials sciencePulp and paper industryWaste managementJet fuelHeat of combustionChemical engineeringChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water removal from both biodiesel and diesel/biodiesel blends was studied using a natural removable additive, natural resin. Specifically, two different samples of biodiesel/diesel blends and one of JP8 fuel were studied before and after the blending process with the natural additive. As well as moisture concentration, the properties of density, kinematic viscosity, conductivity, flash point, and heat of combustion were also investigated. Using the proposed method of water removal improves the physicochemical properties of biodiesel/diesel fuel blends, increases the heat of combustion up to 361 J/g, reduces the moisture by ∼66 %, and reduces the conductivity down to 39.5 %. In the case of JP8 fuel decreasing moisture content increases the heat of combustion by 187 J/g, decreases the conductivity by 60 %, and establishes the moisture level within accepted values, from 68 to lower than 50 mg/kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207