MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1881828676 · doi:10.1002/lsm.21101

Liposomal nanostructures for photosensitizer delivery

2011· review· en· W1881828676 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueLasers in Surgery and Medicine · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhotosensitizerLiposomeChemistryPhotodynamic therapyNanotechnologyBiophysicsMaterials scienceBiologyPhotochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In photodynamic therapy (PDT), photosensitizers are activated by light of a specific wavelength and produce cytotoxic molecules to damage diseased tissues. Most photosensitizers are hydrophobic and easily aggregate in aqueous solution. To maintain their photodynamic activity and to enhance delivery efficiency of photosensitizers, various pharmaceutical carriers and delivery systems have been investigated for photosensitizers. This review will focus on liposomal nanostructures for the delivery of photosensitizing agents. METHODS: The published literature of liposomal structures, formulations, and pharmaceutical applications for photosensitizer delivery was reviewed with the main focus on articles published between 2004 and 2011 after the two excellent reviews by Derycke et al., Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004:56(1); 17-30 and Chen et al., Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005:2(3);477-487. Many articles dating back to 1970s were also covered for the purpose of obtaining information about historoical development of liposomal formulations for photosensitizer delivery. The systematic search was performed using several electronic databases, including Pubmed and Medline with the key search terms including PDT, photosensitizer, liposome, nanoparticle, formulation, biodistribution, etc. RESULTS: This review focuses on liposomal nanostructures with an in depth discussion on the liposomal structure, size-related effect on blood circulation and composition of phospholipids. Different active targeting strategies will also be reviewed which serve to improve specific targeting of photosensitizers to diseased tissue. To further enhance the selective release and accumulation of photosensitizers at the targeted tissue, triggered release methods have been developed. Many other liposomal structure-based nanoparticles have been developed for improved delivery efficiency for topical and systemic administration of pharmaceutics. Finally, a new class of phototransducing liposomes called "porphysomes" will also be introduced, which achieves intrinsic multifunctionality together with structure simplicity. CONCLUSION: Liposomes have been proved to be efficient and safe organic carriers for photosensitizers. Multifunctional liposomal formulations, such as porphysome, are further explored for clinic theranostic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it