Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between bone resorption and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) expression in autogenous and allogenic bone grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 critical-size (10 x 15 mm) defects were created in rabbit mandibles bilaterally. Three groups of six defects each were grafted with autogenous endochondral (EC) bone, autogenous intramembranous (IM) bone, and allogenic IM bone. Three months later, the defects were retrieved for quantitative analysis on the basis of histology, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization. RESULTS: A close relationship existed between MMP-9 expression and graft bone resorption. The parallel between MMP-9 expression and graft bone resorption suggested that bone resorption was accomplished in part by increased MMP-9 production evident in preosteoclasts and osteoclasts. CONCLUSIONS: MMP-9 plays an important role in graft bone resorption. Autogenous EC bone grafts express higher levels of MMP-9 leading to more resorption than autogenous or allogenic IM bone grafts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".