MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aplicação do ultrassom na coalescência de emulsões água em óleo.

2013· dissertation· pt· W1882979409 on OpenAlexaff
Agesinaldo Matos Silva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ao meu orientador, Prof. Dr. Julio Cezar Adamowski, por confiar em mim e ter me indicado excelentes caminhos sem os quais eu não teria alcançado as minhas conquistas enquanto pesquisador desde a minha iniciação científica.Ao Prof. Dr. Marco Aurélio Brizzotti, por ter me co-orientado no mestrado e compartilhado de sua experiência acadêmica desde a minha graduação.Ao Prof. Dr. Flávio Buiochi, pelas diversas discussões elucidativas sobre os modelos teóricos desenvolvidos durante o mestrado.À PETROBRAS pelos recursos financeiros necessários ao desenvolvimento deste trabalho através do convênio Petrobras /ANP-USP-FUSP intitulado "Técnicas de ultrassom para quebra de emulsão água-em-óleo".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207