MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1883158957 · doi:10.1177/1753193415600669

Impact of scapholunate dissociation on human wrist kinematics

2015· article· en· W1883158957 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada
KeywordsScapholunate ligamentMedicineWristLunateUlnar deviationLunate boneKinematicsAnatomyLigamentCadaverOrthodonticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neither the complex motions of the scapholunate joint, nor the kinematic changes that occur as a result of injury to it, are fully understood. We used electromagnetic tracking within affected bones to evaluate the physiologic motions in the planes of flexion and extension, and of radial and ulnar deviation of human cadaver wrists, before and after complete transection of the scapholunate ligaments. Despite individual variance between each wrist, we were able to establish a pattern in the changes that occurred after scapholunate ligament injury. During the motions examined, the scaphoid showed an increase in translational deviation in almost all motion axes. In contrast, the movement of the lunate seemed to be impaired, especially in radial-ulnar deviation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it