MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1883518104 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1557437

Angle of attack estimation and aircraft controller design using LQR methods

2006· article· en· W1883518104 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Zamani Fekri, Mohammad Mobed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)EstimatorController (irrigation)Kalman filterNonlinear systemComputer scienceExtended Kalman filterSet (abstract data type)Control engineeringEngineeringMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An LQ-based tracker is designed in this paper, using output feedback. For performing the design, at first, a structured controller is introduced for a set of equations. The controller is obtained by minimizing a cost function which has some penalties on both the system's inputs and states. After that, an estimator is introduced and combined with the controller to close the loop. Running the nonlinear simulation at the end verifies the superiority of extended Kalman estimator (EKF)to the linear Kalman estimator (LKF)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGuidance and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207