Estruturas de Governança em Cooperativas de Crédito Brasileiras e Canadenses: um comparativo sob a ótica da Teoria dos Custos de Transação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo objetiva analisar a influencia das Estruturas de Governanca (EG) nos Custos de Transacao (CT) de Cooperativas de Credito brasileiras e canadenses. A analise de dois estudos de caso no Brasil e no Canada comprovou que a evolucao das estruturas de governanca ocorreu, simultaneamente, a evolucao do ambiente juridico-institucional, em um processo dialetico. Constatou-se, nos casos do Movimento Desjardins e do Sistema Sicredi que, embora evoluindo a partir de ambientes institucionais distintos, ha uma tendencia a homogenia das redes na criacao de instituicoes ad hoc para lidar com a governanca. Assim, ambas as redes possuem instituicoes especificas para lidar com essas funcoes. A diferenca principal reside no tipo societario utilizado e no processo de governanca decorrente deste. Inferiu-se, ao final da pesquisa, uma equacao para comparar as EG hibridas, em que custos incorridos para realizar transacoes internas, somado aos custos das pressoes politicas e sociais precisam ser menores ou iguais aos CT com instituicoes com EG hierarquicas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".