MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1883701165 · doi:10.1002/2013jd020480

Spectral calibration and validation of the Cross‐track Infrared Sounder on the Suomi NPP satellite

2013· article· en· W1883701165 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsABB (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationRemote sensingApodizationSatelliteDetectorEnvironmental scienceInfraredTrack (disk drive)Radiometric calibrationOpticsStability (learning theory)PhysicsComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cross‐track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) radiometric accuracy depends upon accurate frequency calibration. Here we present both the prelaunch calibration of the sensor and the minor modifications needed to this calibration post launch. Particular emphasis is given to ensuring that all nine detectors on each of the three CrIS focal planes are on a common frequency scale with accurate off‐axis apodization corrections. Radiances from the current operational algorithm have a frequency calibration that is stable to 2 ppm, although this work suggests that the CrIS instrument is capable of a frequency calibration stability of better than 1 ppm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it