Bibliographic record
Abstract
The economic analysis of international law is the new development of international law theories in last decade. Based on existing references, this thesis intents to promote application of economic analysis of international law in China with pluralistic ways of research (for examples, political, legal and economic) in order to understand the contemporary issues of international law and to have new ideas. The part I is a brief comparison between domestic and international laws from economic perspective, and then a description of applicable economic analysis for international law with an emphasis of its theoretical and practical significances. The part II is focused on Coase’s Law & Economics as the basis of economic analysis of international law. The part III to V provide with a few examples of economic analysis of international laws, i.e. law of international economic organization, international environmental law and international humanitarian law. The conclusion is given finally. Key words: theory of international law, economic analysis, law of international economic organization, international environmental law and international humanitarian law Resume: L’analyse economique de la loi internationale est le nouveau developpement des theories de la loi internationale dans la derniere decennie. Base sur des references existantes, cette these tente de promouvoir l’application de l’analyse economique de la loi internaionale en Chine avec des methodes de recherche pluralistes(par exemple, politique, legale et economique) afin de comprendre les problematiques contemporains de la loi internationale et de s’en faire de nouvelles idees. La partie I procede a une comparaison breve entre les lois domestiques et internationales sous l’angle economique et a une description des analyses economiques applicables aux lois internationales en mettant l’accent sur leurs significations theoriques et pratiques. La partie II se concentre sur la Loi de Coase&Economie qui sert de base d’analyse. De la partie III a la partie V, on trouve des exemples de l’analyse economique des lois internationals, par exemple, la loi internationale de l’organisation economique , la loi international de l’environnement et la loi internationale humaniste. Enfin, la conclusion est degagee. Mots-Cles: theorie de la loi internationale, analyse economique, loi internationale de l’organisation economique, loi internationale de l’environnement et loi internationale humaniste
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".