MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1883764327 · doi:10.1109/auv.1994.518639

Arctic Ocean trials of Trackpoint ultrashort baseline acoustic positioning systems

2002· article· en· W1883764327 on OpenAlexaff
Mervin R. Black, B. Butler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUSBGlobal Positioning SystemUnderwaterSubmarineSea trialArcticComputer scienceMarine engineeringRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceSimulationEngineeringTelecommunicationsGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the development of Theseus, an under-ice autonomous underwater vehicle, trials were conducted to evaluate the performance of Trackpoint II and LXT ultrashort baseline (USB) acoustic positioning systems. These systems have been proposed to provide long range vehicle homing and surface station tracking of the Theseus AUV. These trials were carried out in the Arctic Ocean in 1992 and 1993. The trials were performed by operating the Trackpoint master stations from temporary ice stations with warm tents and living quarters. Helicopters or snow machines were used to carry the remote field party and transponders to distant sites for range and bearing measurements. GPS positioning systems and a Geodometer laser survey instrument were used for position reference. Measured range and bearing error data for the USB positioning systems are presented. Ray trace analysis was used to give understanding into acoustic propagation anomalies. The experience gained through these field trials was used in selection of USB positioning systems for the Theseus vehicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207