Family Album as a Portable Home: Marta Balletbò-Coll's "Costa Brava (Family Album)"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este art?culo analiza los modos en que Marta Balletb?-Coll usa el ?lbum familiar en su primera obra, Costa Brava (Family Album), realizada en 1995. Fara ella, el ?lbum familiar es un medio conceptual y est?tico que sirve para desafiar la noci?n convencional de familia. Aprovech?ndose de la universalidad inherente del mismo, la directora catalana legitimiza el estatus de la pareja lesbiana como familia. Cuestiona los protocolos convencionales al enfatizar el proceso de formar una familia. Al contrario del ?lbum convencional, que se limita a capturar los tiempos celebratorios que cristalizan la imagen ideal de la familia, Balletb?-Coll proyecta a la pareja en momentos conflictivos. Mediante el uso del ?lbum familiar, muestra los efectos de la migraci?n global en la constituci?n de la familia, se?alando que los sentimientos tradicionales de pertenencia superan fos ataduras de afectos anteriores. Balletb?-Coll destaca al sujeto migratorio, que convierte cualquier sitio del mundo en su hogar, aunque pierda el apego emocional al hogar restringido al espacio f?sico de un lugar determinado. Por un lado, el ?lbum familiar lesbiano funciona como un hogar port?til, registrando la memoria y el pasado de la vida de la pareja en Barcelona. Por otro, al excluir las fotos sacadas en el espacio interior del hogar, su ?lbum representa el estado de homelessness de esta familia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".