MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1884067514 · doi:10.1111/jace.13949

Electrical and Optical Properties of Transparent Conducting <i>p</i> ‐Type SrTiO <sub>3</sub> Thin Films

2015· article· en· W1884067514 on OpenAlexafffund
Wei Huang, Riad Nechache, Shun Li, Mohamed Chaker, Federico Rosei

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityÉcole de Technologie SupérieureInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesCanada Research ChairsChina Scholarship CouncilCanada Foundation for InnovationMinistère du Développement Économique, de l’Innovation et de l’Exportation
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectrical resistivity and conductivityThin filmMolecular beam epitaxyEpitaxyPulsed laser depositionHall effectSemiconductorDopingOptoelectronicsPerovskite (structure)TransmittanceDeposition (geology)DiffractionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsNanotechnologyCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a systematic study of the electrical and optical properties of epitaxial perovskite p‐ type In‐doped SrTiO 3 thin films (SrIn x Ti 1− x O 3 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.15) grown on single‐crystal (100)‐oriented LaAlO 3 substrates using a hybrid method which combines pulsed laser deposition and molecular beam epitaxy in a range of deposition conditions. X‐ray diffraction analysis confirms the epitaxial growth of high crystal quality films. Four‐point probe and Hall Effect measurements demonstrate that the films are p‐ type semiconductors with a low resistivity of ~10 −2 Ω·cm and a high carrier concentration of ~10 19 cm −3 . The optical transmittance spectra reveal that the films are highly transparent (˃70%) in the visible region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Ceramic SocietySame topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207