A framework for cell phone based diagnosis and management of priority tropical diseases
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malaria, pneumonia, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, amebiasis, and diarrheal diseases are considered existing global health priorities. This is because of their global prevalence, especially in most developing (tropical) countries. These conditions pose a lot of challenges to global health and wellbeing due to their increasing morbidity and mortality rates; a challenge that has been attributed to poor medical infrastructure, poor diagnosis and management of these diseases. These conditions are known to present with similar symptoms at different stages of their pathogenesis and thus can become “confusable” with each other. Medical practitioners attempting to diagnose and manage these conditions are therefore expected to manage large amounts of information (which can sometimes become unwieldy and time wasting) in order to arrive at an accurate and timely diagnosis. Medical facilities can be freed up through the adoption of mobile devices for early diagnosis of some of the tropical conditions. In this paper, we present a framework for a cell phone based intelligent system (based on fuzzy logic and AHP engines) for the diagnosis of some tropical global health priorities. Fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are known to resolve the conflicts arising from ambiguity, uncertainty, and imprecision of information, and thus can be harnessed in the analysis of information supplied by patients in the cell phone-based diagnosis of confusing tropical diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it