MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conspicuously by their absence: Long-haired Kings, Symbolic Capital, Sacred Kingship and other contemporary myths

2012· article· en· W1885719696 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Fabbro

Bibliographic record

VenueSignum · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonarchyInterpretation (philosophy)Reading (process)MythologyCapital (architecture)Government (linguistics)KingdomCharacter (mathematics)Symbolic capitalHistoryRoman EmpireEmpireTransition (genetics)LiteratureAncient historyClassicsArtPhilosophySociologyLawAnthropologyPolitical scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The character of post-Roman government has long been a central issue in understanding the transition from the Roman Empire to the Early Medieval kingdoms. One of the models for understanding the process focuses on the transition of a somewhat rational Roman government to a sacred ‘Germanic’ kingship. Even though this interpretation has long been disproved, it has been brought back to life in a new form, as a reading in cultural anthropology, using as a case example the Long-Haired Merovingian Kings. This article questioned this new approach and reviews the flaws of the historiographic bases of this interpretation and proposes a new reading of the sources

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSignumSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207