MétaCan
← all works

Performance Relevance of Capital Structure Choices

2015· article· en· 1 citations· W1885775725 on OpenAlex· 10.5539/ijef.v7n9p31

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: venue_new · design weight: 2684.25 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Corporate finance study of leverage and firm productivity; although motivated by discrepancies across prior studies, it answers the finance question itself rather than studying the literature.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

The study examines corporate leverage and firm performance, not research itself.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Corporate-finance study of leverage and firm performance; object is firm value, not science.

Abstract

This study identified the reasons behind the discrepancies in the result from the past empirical studies about the effect of leverage on the firm value. Most importantly, by using the Malmquist productivity change index and its components as the proxy for corporate performance, the effect of leverage on corporate performance and the effect of corporate performance on leverage are identified. The results reveal that leverage no not affect the Malmquist productivity change index but the micro analysis shows that leverage defined in total debts to total assets affects technical change significantly but do not affects efficiency change. The reserve causality tests show that the Malmquist productivity change index and its component do not affect leverage. Hence it is proved that leverage do not improve the corporate performance.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
International Journal of Economics and Finance
Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Field
Business, Management and Accounting
Canadian institutions
Funders
Keywords
Leverage (statistics)Capital structureEconomicsBusinessEconometricsProxy (statistics)DebtIndustrial organizationMacroeconomicsMathematicsStatistics
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes