Effect of twelve species of marine phytoplankton on larval survival and development of the mosquito <i>Culex quinquefasciatus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, effect of twelve species of marine phytoplankton on the growth and development of mosquito larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus was investigated. Among the 12 phytoplankton isolates, mortality of the larvae was observed in the suspensions of cyanobacteria species namely, Nostoc commune, Phormidium corium, P. tenue and planktonic green alga Nannochloropsis oceanica. N. oceanica showed effective larvicidal activity with 100% mortality of larvae. The development of larvae fed with phytoplankton cells was delayed compared to the control with respect to the first pupation period. The wing length of the adults emerged from the larvae fed with phytoplankton cells were shorter than control and those of adults emerged from Chroococcus turgidus, Oscillatoria geminata, Chaetoceros calcitrans and Skeletonema costatum treatment were similar in size to that of control. The present study showed that some species may serve as nutritious food for mosquito larvae, whereas others especially N. oceanica has the potential to be used as natural pesticide to control mosquito C. quinquefasciatus ..
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".