Un village « galibi » en Guyane française : le cas du site archéologique d’Eva 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le site d’Eva 2 a livré les vestiges d’un village amérindien de l’époque historique en Guyane française. Le mobilier collecté nous confronte avec une chronologie longue qui s’étale entre 1650 et 1900 de notre ère. En comparant la céramique découverte lors de la fouille et celle des collections de poterie amérindiennes du xix e siècle conservées dans différents musées européens, on observe une ambiguïté chronologique. Ce décalage conduit à l’hypothèse d’une transformation de la céramique produite par les Amérindiens de la bande littorale, nommés Galibis par les premiers colons, au cours de l’époque coloniale et durant le développement d’une production répondant à la demande des colons, notamment tout au long du xix e siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".