MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1886429574 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2001.933700

Specification and enforcement of object-oriented RBAC model

2002· article· en· W1886429574 on OpenAlexaff
C.N. Zhang, Cungang Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRole-based access controlAccess controlComputer scienceSeparation of dutiesAuthorizationComponent (thermodynamics)EnforcementMandatory access controlPermissionObject (grammar)Distributed computingComputer securitySoftware engineeringDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Access control for protection and sharing of information and physical resources is an essential component of any multi-user computer systems. Role-based-access-control (RBAC) has been introduced and has offered a powerful means of specifying access control decisions, as well as reducing the cost of administrating access control policies and making them less error-prone. We proposed an object-oriented RBAC model (ORBAC) and its formal specifications to describe the relationships of the basic elements of the model. Furthermore, an efficient ORBAC implementation method was proposed to deal with statically and dynamically role authorization so that the problem of separation of duties can be solved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207