MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1886579564 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2013-0372

On the strength and nature of intermolecular X···O interactions in CF<sub>2</sub>ClBr−O<sub>3</sub> complexes (X = F, Cl, Br): an ab initio investigation

2013· article· en· W1886579564 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mehdi D. Esrafili, Mohammad Solimannejad

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIntermolecular forceAb initioAb initio quantum chemistry methodsElectron densityComputational chemistryMoleculeElectronAtomic physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ab initio calculations were realized to analyze the existence of intermolecular X···O interactions in bromochlorodifluoromethane (CF 2 ClBr) complexes with ozone, where X = F, Cl, and Br. These calculations have been carried out using MP2 and CCSD(T) methods, through analysis of surface electrostatic potentials V(r), intermolecular interaction energies, and electron density analysis. Coupled cluster (CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ//MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ) calculations indicate that the stabilization energies for the CF 2 ClBr−O 3 complexes lie in the range between –3.9 and –7.7 kJ/mol. The characteristic of X···O interactions has been identified in terms of the electron density analysis within the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. Energy decomposition analysis shows that the attractive nature of the X···O interactions within the title complexes is chiefly due to dispersion effects, but electrostatic contribution also plays an important role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207