Henri Brochet et le R.P. Émile Legault, c.s.c. 1 : rencontre et correspondance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose l’édition de 16 lettres qu’échangèrent le R.P. Émile Legault, c.s.c., et Henri Brochet, entre le 31 janvier 1938 et le 4 mai 1946. Ces lettres nous fournissent des renseignements intéressants sur le séjour d’Émile Legault en France, au lendemain de la visite de Henri Ghéon à Montréal, et sur les débuts des Compagnons de Saint-Laurent 2 . Auteur prolifique de pièces de théâtre chrétien, acteur, metteur en scène, directeur des Compagnons de Jeux — dont s’inspirent les Compagnons de Saint-Laurent —, et ami de Henri Ghéon, Henri Brochet était aussi le fondateur de la revue Jeux, Tréteaux et Personnages, dont le premier numéro parut le 15 octobre 1930 et qu’il dirigea jusqu’à la fin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".