Les personnes âgées aujourd'hui et demain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude des générations actuellement dans la seconde moitié de leur vie adulte annoncent les changements à venir dans les caractéristiques des personnes âgées. Cinq aspects des conditions de vie sont abordés: l’éducation, la participation au marché du travail, le revenu, la préparation financière à la retraite et la consommation. Parmi les tendances favorables aux conditions de vie des personnes âgées de demain, observées à la fois au Québec et en France, on note la hausse du niveau d’éducation, la progression de la participation des femmes sur le marché du travail et l’amélioration du revenu. Les revenus ont progressé davantage chez les personnes âgées que chez les autres groupes d’âge; l’écart entre retraités et actifs a été plus réduit en France. Il est à prévoir que les modifications aux régimes de retraite et aux programmes publics, adoptées dans les dernières années, ou envisagées, auront des effets à long terme sur le revenu des retraités et sur l’âge de la retraite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".