Photonic Band Gap with Coherently Controlled Defeat Induced by a Nanoscale Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photonics band gap properties will be changed dramatically if there is a defect at the center of the photonic crystal. We theoretically proposed a nanoscale structure, i.e., n-doped asymmetric quantum wells, coherently controlled by an infrared laser. Due to the quantum interference in the conduction intersubband transitions, the refractive index could be monitored at some specific wavelength. This structure is applied at the center of the photonic crystal or grating waveguide as a coherently controlled defect . We also investigated the reflection, transmission or delay time of this one-dimensional photonic band gap at various wavelengths while the defect is adjusted by an infrared laser beam. It is believed that the structure could be used in the devices for the optical pulse reshaping, dispersion control, and wavelength filter or used as a distributed Bragg grating reflector for the laser mode tuning. Therefore it might have great applications in the optic communication or information processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".