MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First measurement of the helicity asymmetry E in photoproduction on the proton

2016· article· en· W1888873285 on OpenAlexaff
I. Senderovich, B. Morrison, M. Dugger, B. G. Ritchie, E. Pasyuk, Ross Tucker, J. Brock, C. Carlin, C. Keith, D. G. Meekins, M. L. Seely, D. Rönchen, M. Döring, P. Collins, K. P. Adhikari, D. Adikaram, Z. Akbar, Mark Anderson, S. Anefalos Pereira, R. Badui, J. Ball, N. A. Baltzell, M. Battaglieri, V. Batourine, I. Bedlinskiy, A. S. Biselli, S. Boiarinov, W. J. Briscoe, W. K. Brooks, V. D. Burkert, D. S. Carman, A. Celentano, S. Chandavar, G. Charles, L. Colaneri, P. L. Cole, M. Contalbrigo, O. Cortes, V. Credé, A. D’Angelo, N. Dashyan, R. De Vita, E. De Sanctis, A. Deur, C. Djalali, R. Dupré, H. Egiyan, A. El Alaoui, L. El Fassi, L. Elouadrhiri, P. Eugenio, G. Fedotov, S. Fegan, A. Filippi, J. A. Fleming, A. Fradi, B. Garillon, Y. Ghandilyan, G. P. Gilfoyle, K. L. Giovanetti, F. X. Girod, D. I. Glazier, J. T. Goetz, W. Gohn, E. Golovatch, R. W. Gothe, K. A. Griffioen, M. Guidal, L. Guo, K. Hafidi, H. Hakobyan, C. Hanretty, M. Hattawy, K. Hicks, D. Ho, M. Holtrop, S. M. Hughes, Y. Ilieva, D. G. Ireland, Б. С. Ишханов, D. Jenkins, H. Jiang, H. S. Jo, K. Joo, S. Joosten, D. Keller, G. Khachatryan, M. Khandaker, A. Kim, F. J. Klein, V. Kubarovsky, Michael Kunkel, P. Lenisa, K. Livingston, H. Y. Lu, I. J. D. MacGregor, P. Mattione, B. McKinnon, C. A. Meyer, T. Mineeva, V. Mokeev, R. A. Montgomery, A. Movsisyan, C. Muñoz Camacho, P. Nadel-Turoński, L. A. Net, S. Niccolai, G. Niculescu, I. Niculescu, M. Osipenko, K. Park, S. Park, P. Peng, W. Phelps, S. Pisano, O. Pogorelko, J. W. Price, Y. Prok, A. J. R. Puckett, M. Ripani, A. Rizzo, G. Rosner, P. Roy, F. Sabatié, C. Salgado, D. Schott, R. A. Schumacher, E. Seder, A. Simonyan, Iu. Skorodumina, G. D. Smith, D. I. Sober, N. Sparveris, S. Stepanyan, P. Stoler, I. I. Strakovsky, S. Strauch, V. Sytnik, Y. Tian, M. Ungaro, H. Voskanyan, E. Voutier, N. K. Walford, X. Wei, M. H. Wood, N. Zachariou, L. Zana, J. Zhang, B. Zhao, I. Zonta

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityNuclear PhysicsInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareOffice of ScienceNational Research FoundationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueJohnson Space CenterIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNational Research Foundation of KoreaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsHelicityAsymmetryNuclear physicsParticle physicsSpectrometerPolarization (electrochemistry)NucleonObservableRange (aeronautics)ProtonOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results are presented for the first measurement of the double-polarization helicity asymmetry E for the η photoproduction reaction γ p → η p . Data were obtained using the FROzen Spin Target (FROST) with the CLAS spectrometer in Hall B at Jefferson Lab, covering a range of center-of-mass energy W from threshold to 2.15 GeV and a large range in center-of-mass polar angle. As an initial application of these data, the results have been incorporated into the Jülich–Bonn model to examine the case for the existence of a narrow ⁎ N ⁎ resonance between 1.66 and 1.70 GeV. The addition of these data to the world database results in marked changes in the predictions for the E observable from that model. Further comparison with several theoretical approaches indicates these data will significantly enhance our understanding of nucleon resonances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207