MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1888977285 · doi:10.22323/1.236.0787

VERITAS Observations of The Galactic Center Ridge

2016· preprint· en· W1888977285 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. W. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of The 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2015) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGalactic planeGalactic CenterAstrophysicsGalaxySupernovaAstronomyRidgePoint sourceBlack hole (networking)Supernova remnantPaleontologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Galactic Center Ridge has been observed extensively in the past by both GeV and TeV instruments revealing a wealth of structure, including both a diffuse component, the point sources G 0.9+0.1 (a composite supernova remnant) and SgrA* (believed to be associated with the super massive black hole located at the center of our galaxy). Previous observations (> 300 GeV) with the H.E.S.S. array have also detected an extended TeV component along the Galactic plane due to either diffuse emission or a host of unresolved point sources. Here we report on the VERITAS observations of the Galactic Center Ridge from 2010-2014 in the energy range above 2 TeV. From these observations we 1.) Provide improved measurements of the differential energy spectra for SgrA* in the multi-TeV regime, 2.) Provide a detection in the 2 TeV band of the composite SNR G 0.9+0.1 and an improvement of its multi-TeV energy spectrum. 3.) Report on the detection of an extended component of emission along the Galactic plane by VERITAS. 4.) Report on the detection of VER J1746-289, a localized enhancement of TeV emission along the Galactic plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of The 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2015)Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207