MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1889368917 · doi:10.4000/books.igpde.609

Le recrutement des gens des comptes de Nevers à l’Époque moderne (1539-1790)

2011· book-chapter· fr· W1889368917 on OpenAlexaff
Katie Brzustowski

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionLa Chambre des comptes de Nevers a été créée en 1405, à la suite de la constitution de terres du duché de Bourgogne en apanage pour Philippe le Bon. Son premier règlement, qui reprend les instructions pour la Chambre de Dijon, fut édicté en 1406. C’est la seule Chambre des comptes seigneuriale qui ait survécu jusqu’à la Révolution.Son champ d’activité se restreint à partir des années 1650, à commencer par son ressort géographique qui, au fil des partages successoraux et des alién...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooksSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207