MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1889508571

Disparition. Jean-Pierre Issenhuth, Rêveries, Montréal, Boréal, coll. « Papiers collés », 2001, 264 p.; Entretien d’un autre temps, Montréal, Noroît, 2001, 132 p.; Deux passions, Montréal, Hurtubise HMH, coll. « L’arbre », 2001, 96 p. Jean-Pierre Issenhuth, Rêveries, Montréal, Boréal, coll. « Papiers collés », 2001, 264 p.; Entretien d’un autre temps, Montréal, Noroît, 2001, 132 p.; Deux passions, Montréal, Hurtubise HMH, coll. « L’arbre », 2001, 96 p.

2002· article· fr· W1889508571 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marie‐Andrée Lamontagne

Bibliographic record

VenueLiberté · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPassionsLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0150.016
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.007
Bibliometrics0.0040.020
Science and technology studies0.0280.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0110.006
Research integrity0.0120.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLibertéSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207