MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1889713432 · doi:10.1109/robot.1995.525478

Implementing a discrete-event-system-based supervisory controller for a flexible manufacturing workcell

2002· article· en· W1889713432 on OpenAlexaff
S.C. Lauzon, Anji Ma, J.K. Mills, B. Benhabib

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkcellSupervisory controlProgrammable logic controllerController (irrigation)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Embedded systemSupervisory control theoryEvent (particle physics)Control engineeringProcess controlHost (biology)Control (management)EngineeringRobotOperating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a generalized implementation of DES-based supervisory controller methodology, that utilizes recent theoretical advances in conjunction with programmable-logic-controller (PLC) technology, is presented. The two primary advantages of the proposed methodology are: 1) the utilization of limited-size control strategies that can be efficiently generated online, and which are conflict and deadlock free by construction; and 2) the use of PLCs, which are currently the most suitable and widely employed industrial process-control technology. In our proposed methodology, a host personal computer (PC) possesses an online capability for the automatic generation of supervisory-control strategies, and their downloading to a PLC as required. The PLC, in turn, is responsible for monitoring the workcell reacting to events and enforcing device behaviour based on the current control strategy residing in its processor. A supervisory controller developed based on this approach, was successfully implemented for a manufacturing workcell in our laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207