MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Imaging quasi-vertical geological faults with earthquake data

2012· article· en· W1890019135 on OpenAlexaff
Polina Zheglova, Joyce R. McLaughlin, S. W. Roecker, Jin-Sung Yoon, D. Renzi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismologyGeologyReflection (computer programming)SeismogramFault (geology)Distortion (music)P waveSeismic waveSurface waveSynthetic seismogramOrientation (vector space)Earthquake locationActive faultGeodesyGeometryInduced seismicityOpticsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a method for imaging quasi-vertically dipping faults with surface records of reflected P waves from small earthquakes. Faults are boundaries between geological structures, such as tectonic plates, and are located in earthquake active regions such as Parkfield, California. The high degree of seismic activity enables the use of multiple seismic recordings in our fault identification algorithm. Major challenges occur because of the quasi-vertical orientation of the fault and the fact that the wave reflected by the fault and recorded by the surface receivers is not well modelled by the direct arrival of the propagating wave generated by the earthquake source. Our method uses the 2-D acoustic wave equation as the model for P-wave propagation. We assume that an approximate wave speed map on the reflection side of the fault is available and the source locations are known, for example, from traveltime tomography. We also assume that the source time function is known. The new features of our method arise because earthquake sources are located very close to the fault. This has two implications: (1) the direct arrival and the reflected wave arrive almost simultaneously, so that it is impossible to separate them on a seismogram using standard techniques, and (2) most of the reflections occur above the critical angle which introduces a distortion in the reflected wave. To overcome these difficulties we use a modelled incident wave to (1) remove the direct arrival from the data, and (2) remove the post-critical distortion from the reflected wave. We justify the distortion removal using the leading-order term of an asymptotic expansion, and an optimization procedure. To complete our algorithm we utilize some features of reverse time migration: (1) the use of full acoustic wave equation for modelling and backpropagation, and (2) zero-lag correlation of the backpropagated time reversed reflected and incident fields. We present numerical examples of fault reconstructions with synthetic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207