Experimental Research on Placement Law of Injected Agent in General Water Shutoff for Horizontal Wells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to research the placement law of injected agent in general water shutoff for horizontal wells, injection and water plugging experiments were carried out based on horizontal well models. Normal model was modified to research placement of gel quantitatively. Plane heterogeneity and well trajectory changes were also considered in the models. Experiments results indicated that injected agent was not uniformly placed along the horizontal direction in general injection. The agent was more likely to enter the zone near heel end because of pressure drop along horizontal well. High permeable area and lower well part were both favorable factors for blocking agent’s entrance. The final placement was determined by the game between the factors and pressure drop. When the two factors existed at heel end, the non-uniform placement would be even intensified, and the differences among each part would enlarge. Conversely, when the two factors existed at toe end, it was beneficial to make the placement of injected agent more uniform. The performances of general water shutoff were influenced by the placement law of injected agent. The breakthrough water will be better plugged if more of injected agent went to objective position, which induced a better oil production after the treatment. Therefore, researching and making use of the placement law of injected agent is beneficial to improve the performance of general water shutoff in application. Key words: Water plugging experiment; Water shutoff; Horizontal wells
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".