MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tips from an Accidental “Interculturalist”

2011· article· en· W1890139326 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eli Cannon

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesFaithConversationEthnologyPolitical scienceSociologyArtPhilosophyTheologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Host parenting an international exchange student facing a medical crisis brings representatives of 1st and 3rd Worlds together under one roof. All parties are mature, adult English speakers who have travelled internationally; the medical crisis resolves happily. Why, then, so much hurt and anger? Why so much ill will? A host Dad looks back at some of the speed bumps and flashpoints that were provoked by ordinary, well-intentioned conversation, along with good faith efforts to get through them. Key words: International; Intercultural; Interculturalist; Exchange student; Host parent; CommunicationResume: Le parent d’accueil des etudiants d’echange internationaux face a une crise medicale qui reunit les representants venant du pays avances et des pays en voie de developpement sous un meme toit. Toutes les participants sont des orateurs anglais murs, adultes qui ont voyage internationalement; la crise medicale resout heureusement. Pourquoi, et tant de mal et colere ? Pourquoi tant de mauvaise volonte? Un Papa hote regarde derriere soi a certains des ralentisseurs et des points d'ignition qui ont ete provoques par la conversation ordinaire, bien intentionnee, avec des bons efforts de foi de les passer.Mots-cles: International; Interculturel; Interculturaliste; Un programme d'echange; parent d'accueil; Communication

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.011
Scholarly communication0.0110.017
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0060.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207