MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1890197273 · doi:10.1139/p08-035

The 5s<sup>2</sup>5p<sup>4</sup> – (5s5p<sup>5</sup> + 5p<sup>3</sup>6s) transitions in Ce VII and 5s<sup>2</sup>5p<sup>3</sup> <sup>4</sup>S – 5s5p<sup>4</sup> 4P transitions in Ce VIII

2008· article· en· W1890197273 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
A. Tauheed, Y N Joshi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSt. Francis Xavier University
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsSpectral lineCeriumSpectroscopyResonance (particle physics)Spectrum (functional analysis)Spectrograph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spectrum of cerium was photographed in the 300–1230 Å wavelength region on a 3~m normal incidence spectrograph at the Antigonish laboratory and on a 3 m grazing incidence spectrograph at the Institute of Spectroscopy laboratory in Troitsk in the 250–350 Å region. The 5s 2 5p 4 – (5s5p 5 + 5p 3 6s) transitions of six-time ionized cerium (Ce~VII) were identified. All levels of these three configurations have been established. Forty spectral lines have been classified in the Ce VII spectrum. Configuration interaction Hartree–Fock calculations and least-squares-fitted parametric calculations were used to interpret the observed spectrum. In the Ce VIII spectrum, we have identified the 5s 2 5p 3 S 3/2 – 5s5p 4 P 1/2, 3/2, 5/2 resonance transitions. PACS Nos.: 32.30.Jc, 32.30.–r

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0030.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207