MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1891132391 · doi:10.1109/icip.2001.959086

A new method for removal of edge artifacts using a 2D extrapolated discrete wavelet transform with biorthogonal wavelets

2002· article· en· W1891132391 on OpenAlexaff
Sumit K. Nath, Éric Dubois

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletDiscrete wavelet transformBiorthogonal systemArtificial intelligenceWavelet transformComputer visionComputer scienceImage processingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionLifting schemeImage (mathematics)Second-generation wavelet transformStationary wavelet transformBiorthogonal waveletAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is a tool extensively used in image processing algorithms. It can be used to decorrelate information from the original image, which can thus help in compressing the data for storage, transmission or other post-processing purposes. However, the finite nature of such images gives rise to edge artifacts in the reconstructed data. A commonly used technique to overcome this problem is a symmetric extension of the image, which can preserve zeroth order continuity in the data. This still produces undesirable edge artifacts in derivatives and subsampled versions of the image. To overcome this problem, we present a new method of wavelet analysis by extrapolating the image based on a method presented by Therrien and El-Shaer (1989) and extended by Kuduvalli and Rangayyan (1993).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207