Film Workshops as Polyvocal Public Spheres: Minor Cinemas in Sweden
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La culture de l’atelier de cinéma est un phénomène négligé dans l’histoire et la recherche en cinéma. Cet article propose l’idée que les ateliers qui ont proliféré dans les années 1960, 1970 et 1980 ont souvent constitué des espaces publics au sens qu’Habermas, Negt ou Kluge donnent au terme. Portant attention à l’atelier de cinéma suédois Filmverkstan (1973-2001), cet article démontre que les films issus d’ateliers étaient en résonance avec les « modes de vie concrets » d’un public (Lebenszusammenhang) plutôt d’être des produits visant pour un marché spécifique. De plus, les ateliers offraient un accès à la réalisation à diverses personnes. Cette recherche sur les ateliers de cinéma en tant qu’espace public, comme culture de polyvocalité et comme pratique mineure du cinéma réagit de façon productive aux approches téléologiques et textuelles qui ont prévalu en études cinématographiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".