François Sarazin: Interpreter at Arkansas Post during the Chickasaw Wars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OF LOUISIANA'S MANY TREASURES, NONE IS MORE INTERESTING than collection, dating from about 1714, of official letters, documents, and court records of French Superior Council and those of its successor, Spanish Cabildo, which reside today in archives of Louisiana State Museum in New Orleans. Of these, few are perhaps more intriguing than a certain letter from one Francois Sarazin, cadet soldat and interpreter at Arkansas Post in mid-eighteenth century. Sir I take advantage of this opportunity by way of my brother who is going down to New Orleans to assure you of my very sincere regards and at same time to beg you to forgive me because I did not keep my word, but Sir it was not my fault. He who has my young slave has not yet descended [the Arkansas River], without whom I was unable to send them to you. Consequently I will not be going down this year, because voyageurs [French independent traders] who are beholden to me have not returned, they have been gone to trap game in Arkansa[s] since this autumn, to make your pots [of bear oil] that I owe you, which I was unable to make this year. I beg you to excuse me for not having sent them to you, but I hope you will be pleased when I do come down. I am sending you by way of my brother thirteen deerskins, two bear skins, including their claws and nostrils, and two doe skins. Nothing else to relate to you for present, knowing that you will learn through my brother of death of Monsieur Bertet and of attack that Arkansa[s] made upon Choctaws in River. Some Yazoos killed a man and a woman and took five as slaves. Then they burned a man in frame. I am, Sir, and will remain all my life with all respect and submission, Sir. Your humble and very obedient servant, Francois Sarazin Compliments if you please to Poupee. I plan on bringing her something that will please her. At Arkansa[s]-May 1, 1749.1 This letter affords a rare glimpse of life at Arkansas Post in eighteenth century, as well as an opportunity to reconstruct life story of an Arkansas colonial, something that few historians have attempted. Francois' parents, Anne Francoise Rolland and Nicholas Sarazin, were among first French settlers to arrive in Louisiana, which then encompassed much of Mississippi Valley. Both parents were frequently mentioned in early colonial French reports. French women retained their maiden names; therefore, Anne Francoise's surname was always Rolland. By her early twenties, young Anne Francoise Rolland had gotten into habit of going alone to public dance halls in her native Paris and coming home with strange men. Her father, a Parisian administrator, sent her to live in a convent and later apprenticed her to a dressmaker, but she refused to change her ways. Finally, he filed a complaint against her. She was declared incorrigible by court, sent to Bastille, and shipped to Louisiana in June 1719 to become a bride for one of its settlers. Of many men who wanted French wives, Anne Francoise chose Nicholas Sarazin, an employee of John Law's Company of Indies. This was entity, known as the Company, to which king of France had conveyed right to develop Louisiana.2 Nicholas Sarazin probably came to Louisiana directly from France, rather than Canada, as no trace of him was found after extensive search of colonial Canadian records. He first appears in a Louisiana record dated March 12, 1719. On that date, Council of Commerce of Louisiana in Mobile decided to send Sieur Sarazin as a clerk to Post of Alabamas (Fort Toulouse) to conduct Company's business there. The June 1721 census of Mobile shows Nicholas Sarazin, gardemagazin, and wife, but no children. A garde-magazin was a minor but important administrator who ran a company warehouse or trading post, called magazin, at a settlement. In that same year, capital of Louisiana was moved to New Orleans, and most of settlers at Mobile moved there also. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".