The Blood Contains Multiple Distinct Progenitor Populations with Clonogenic B and T Lineage Potential
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thymus is seeded by bone marrow-derived progenitors that circulate in the blood. Multiple cell types can be found in the thymus early after i.v. administration or in steady state, but most fail to satisfy the known characteristics of true T progenitors. Cells that do conform to classical definitions retain multilineage potential, but surprisingly, cannot make B cells. Because acquisition of the T lineage fate among noncommitted progenitors is a lengthy process, the absence of B cell potential in early thymocytes suggests that B and T lineages diverge prethymically. To test this suggestion, we screened numerous presumptive progenitor populations for T cell growth and differentiation potential, as well as for clonogenic T or B cell development. We find that blood and marrow each contain multiple distinct subsets that display growth and differentiation potential consistent with being canonical T progenitors. Assessment of clonogenic potential further shows that although all blood and marrow populations have high T cell cloning potential, no T/non-B cells are apparent. These data suggest that either true thymic reconstitution potential derives from a small T/non-B cell subset of one of these populations, or that most of the cells defined as canonical progenitors within the thymus do not, in fact, reside in the mainstream of T progenitor differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".