MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Achieving postoperative target range increases success of strabismus surgery in adults: a case for adjustable sutures?

2015· article· en· W1891863395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Ophthalmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEsotropiaExotropiaMedicineDiplopiaStrabismus surgeryStrabismusSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyMinimum deviationOphthalmologyCohortInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the role of achieving immediate target angles on the success of strabismus surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients over 12 years old undergoing strabismus surgery with either adjustable or non-adjustable sutures. Target angle for patients with esotropia and vertical deviation was within 4 prism dioptres (PD) of orthotropia and for patients with exotropia between orthotropia and 8 PD of esotropia. Success was defined as alignment within 10 PD for horizontal rectus surgery and within 5 PD of orthotropia for vertical rectus surgery, without diplopia or reoperations. The main outcome measure was surgical success rate. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-three patients were included in the study with mean follow-up of 13.9 (4-132) months. Patients achieving the target angle immediately postoperatively had higher success rate than patients who did not (83.6% vs 63.7%, p<0.0001, OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.9). When target angle was achieved, adjustable and non-adjustable sutures had similar success (84.8% and 80.9%, respectively, p=0.46, OR 1.3, CI 0.58 to 2.9). However, patients undergoing adjustable surgery were more likely to obtain the target angle (75.5% vs 54%, p<0.0001, OR 2.7, CI 1.7 to 4.2). Success for exotropia surgery was significantly higher when the immediate target angle was achieved (86.4% vs 58.7%, p<0.0001, OR 4.47, CI 2.3 to 8.6). For esotropia and vertical deviations, a similar beneficial effect was not shown (p=0.31, OR 1.6, CI 0.65 to 4.0 and p=0.33, respectively). On multiple logistic regressions, sex, amblyopia, binocularity and reoperations were not significant factors in surgical success. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that achieving the immediate target angle is the most significant factor in the success of strabismus surgery for exotropia. Adjustable suture surgery results in higher proportion of patients achieving this target angle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it