MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Necessities and Existing Problems of Bilingual Teaching in Higher Learning Institutions

2010· article· en· W1892072419 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ya Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnotationBilingual educationHumanitiesPedagogyMathematics educationSociologyPolitical scienceLinguisticsPsychologyArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starting from the connotation of bilingual teaching, this paper elaborates the necessities of bilingual teaching in higher learning institutions and analyzes problems existing. It provides corresponding countermeasures in the end as well. Key words: bilingual teaching, necessities, problems Resume: Commencant par la connotation de l’enseignement bilingue, l’article present expose d’abord la necessite de l’application de l’enseignement bilingue dans les ecoles superieures, puis analyse les problemes existants en ce domaine, et enfin propose des contre-mesures. Mots-cles: enseignement bilingue, necessite, problemes 摘要:本文從雙語教學的內涵入手,闡述了在高校推行雙語教學的必要性,並分析了雙語教學存在的問題, 最後提出了相應的對策。 關鍵詞:雙語教學;必要性;問題

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicHigher Education and Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207