MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1892576179 · doi:10.4000/lhomme.28752

Jérôme Garcin, ed., Nouvelles Mythologies

2009· article· fr· W1892576179 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Laberge

Bibliographic record

VenueL Homme · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsCanadian Transplant Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyHumanitiesPhilosophyArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’idée est excellente et il fallait y penser : les Mythologies de Roland Barthes avaient marqué l’univers de l’essai en France et demeurent une référence unique pour mieux saisir certains traits spécifiques de la pensée française du milieu du xxe siècle. Sur un tout autre mode, Gustave Flaubert avait bien rédigé son Dictionnaire des idées reçues. Seul le temps pouvait peut-être affaiblir les Mythologies de Barthes ; en relisant ce livre après plus de cinquante années, on constate que l’appare...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL HommeSame topicFrench Literature and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207